Crucible Vs Mccarthyism Essay - 1297 Words

Government structure was a big deal during the late 1940 s -1950’s. The US was democracy and the Soviet Union was based off of communism. The two forms of leadership played a major role throughout the upcoming years. In the US, you were either for democracy or not. If you were not you would be black listed and an outcast. This is because during that time, the government thought that there were spies from the Soviet Union and other countries who were into communism. A man named Joseph McCarthy added unto the fear of people by saying he knew 205 communist and 81 in the state department. Many American told on others just to save themselves from being questioned or accused. The act of doing so was later called McCarthyism. This relates to†¦show more content†¦The American people need the facts and all the facts about all aspects of Communism in order to deal with it wisely and effectively†. The man who is speaking, Elia Kazan was an outstanding Hollywood director. Renowned worldwide for films, for example, On the Waterfront and A Streetcar Named Desire. Before this he testified before HUAC three months before, he returned in April 1952 to give his true response on the questioning. Mr. Kazan Unfortanely, feed into the fear. He did not want to be black listed anymore and it was all for reputation sake. He gave the names of the people he was with too save himself from any more humiliation. In the Crucible, there was a scene that had a similar approach. In document B it says â€Å": Take courage, you must give us all their names. How can you bear to see this child suffering? †¦ want to open myself! They turn to her, startled. She is enraptured, as though in a pearly light. I want the light of God, I want the sweet love of Jesus! I danced for the Devil; I saw him; I wrote in his book; I go back to Jesus; I kiss His hand. I saw Sarah Good with the Devil! I saw Goody Osburn with the Devil! I saw Bridget Bishop with the Devil!† This par t of the play helps readers understand that because of certain words the priest said the lady change her mind. She too allowed fear to take over her actions without thinking about the consequences of others. Also within that time, not only did fear come in but it lead to people beShow MoreRelatedThe Hands Of An Angry God1627 Words   |  7 Pagesand The Crucible Essay Two coarse yet uniquely fragile societies, three hundred years apart, devoured by individual ideologies that permeated belief systems, that blinded, deafened, and muted citizens, and that ultimately led to gruesome hysteria. â€Å"Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God†, written by Jonathan Edwards in the mid-1700’s, is a sermon directed to a Puritan congregation urging with orthodox fervor for transgressors to repent. Arthur Miller wrote the allegorical play The Crucible in 1953Read MoreThe Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx Essay2047 Words   |  9 Pagesof communism, including Hugo Chavez and Joseph Stalin, have perfected the art of exploitation of the mind through mob mentality, or the human tendency to take on certain emotional, violent behaviors in large groups. Arthur Miller in the play The Crucible and Ray Bradbury in his novel Fahrenheit 451 critique the negative effects of communism, especially the mob mentality its leaders create in referencing a similar past, historical event and a possible future consequence. A unique characteristic ofRead More William Faulkners Use of Shakespeare Essay5388 Words   |  22 Pagesperspective of the present. One of the best illustrations of this point is Arthur Miller’s great play, The Crucible, on the literal level a treatment of the mass hysteria evidenced in the Salem witchcraft trials of 1692 but through contextual parallels an expose of the McCarthyism that was rampant in America at the time Miller published the play, 1953. There can be no denying that The Crucible is an â€Å"historical† play; but it would certainly be a mistake to view the play as merely or even primarily